<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Never mind! Expedia quietly voids &#8212; then unvoids &#8212; terms on refer-a-friend promo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elliott.org/blog/never-mind-expedia-quietly-voids-then-unvoids-terms-on-refer-a-friend-promo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elliott.org/blog/never-mind-expedia-quietly-voids-then-unvoids-terms-on-refer-a-friend-promo/</link>
	<description>Consumer advocate Christopher Elliott&#039;s site.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Booth</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/blog/never-mind-expedia-quietly-voids-then-unvoids-terms-on-refer-a-friend-promo/comment-page-1/#comment-22565</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Booth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=7789#comment-22565</guid>
		<description>So... they didn&#039;t respond to you either, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; they didn&#8217;t respond to you either, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carver</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/blog/never-mind-expedia-quietly-voids-then-unvoids-terms-on-refer-a-friend-promo/comment-page-1/#comment-22472</link>
		<dc:creator>Carver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=7789#comment-22472</guid>
		<description>I have to respectfully disagree with the notion that Expedia can ethically retroactively change the terms of the agreement.  That&#039;s highly unfair.  If someone gamed the system, then that&#039;s Expedia&#039;s tough luck.  They should have hired a professional service company to run their promotion like everyone else does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to respectfully disagree with the notion that Expedia can ethically retroactively change the terms of the agreement.  That&#8217;s highly unfair.  If someone gamed the system, then that&#8217;s Expedia&#8217;s tough luck.  They should have hired a professional service company to run their promotion like everyone else does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/blog/never-mind-expedia-quietly-voids-then-unvoids-terms-on-refer-a-friend-promo/comment-page-1/#comment-22452</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=7789#comment-22452</guid>
		<description>Without reading too much about this, it looks like this was possibly not well thought out and expedia stood to lose a lot of money.

For Expedia:   Better check to make sure you can make a profit on your promotions.

For customers:  Don&#039;t expect people to lose money to give you a benefit.  If it is too good to be true, it probably is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without reading too much about this, it looks like this was possibly not well thought out and expedia stood to lose a lot of money.</p>
<p>For Expedia:   Better check to make sure you can make a profit on your promotions.</p>
<p>For customers:  Don&#8217;t expect people to lose money to give you a benefit.  If it is too good to be true, it probably is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

