Florida Attorney General announces sellout “settlement” with Royal Caribbean

March 10, 2008

Are the illegal fuel surcharges imposed by cruise lines about to be scuttled? Don’t hold your breath. Royal Caribbean today announced a settlement with Florida’s Attorney General to eliminate its controversial fuel surcharge for bookings made before Nov. 16 and to refund any fees already collected. Other major cruise lines are expected to follow.

“There’s gonna be a lot of happy cruisers,” Sandi Copes, spokeswoman for Attorney General Bill McCollum, told the AP.

Wrong, Sandi.

It’s a terrible deal for consumers. According to the Royal Caribbean announcement, the so-called “fuel supplement” remains in place for North American bookings made on or after Nov. 16.

And look closer. The Royal Caribbean settlement amends a 1997 agreement that cruise lines were not to put extra charges on their bills unless they were for taxes or government fees. The companies now may add surcharges as long as those costs are properly disclosed to customers.

So Royal Caribbean refunds $21 million to a few thousand customers. But in exchange, it gets to charge millions — potentially hundreds of millions — to customers in extra fees.

What do you think of this settlement? Oh, don’t bother telling me. Let the Florida Attorney General know.

9 comments

{ 2 trackbacks }

tripso.com | Cruise passengers battered by unethical surcharges
July 11, 2008 at 8:56 am
tripso.com | Surprised? You must not get out that often
February 6, 2009 at 8:18 am

{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }

Jesse March 11, 2008 at 12:31 am

Should people from other states email him?

Jaxon March 11, 2008 at 1:36 am

I am doing jumping jacks!!!!! Thanks to everyone who wrote the AG!!!

Jaxon March 11, 2008 at 1:43 am

Just read the rest of your article — didn’t come up the first time. Their new contracts, post implementation day, allowed for adding extra charges, anyway. RCL’s for most anything — Carnival’s for fuel only. The fact that the old contracts were upheld is a victory! Kudo’s to you for being the only travel writer to mention “illegal” in your writing. And kudos to all of us who wrote the AG to have the contract upheld.

If you actually read the 1997 agreement, it is a bit more complicated and only held their collective feet to the fire until one of them broke the agreement. I read it some time ago.

Joe Farrell March 11, 2008 at 7:17 am

Well, Chris, at least now you know about it. This is the best you can expect in the legal world right now. Contract law does matter – and if the fee is disclosed, then its ok. RCCL’s contract permits new fees, but, you see, the new fees are not ‘disclosed’ unless they are referenced specifically in a booking.

Trust me, you are not going to start seeing fees for red meat surcharge, food surcharge, buffet surcharge, etc etc. since those fees are not disclosed n advance. The remainder of the 1997 settlement is in effect. and that requires specificity of charges. Its not perfect, but then nothing ever is. That all being said, you can decide to cruise with a company or not – personally, the not remains an option. There is ZERO reason to do business with companies that modify their promises in the middle of a transaction and then expect you to hold the bag for them.

If enough people simply refuse, then they change the way they do business or lose the business.

I just turned down a British airways flight that had an airfare of $238 and fees, fuel surcharges, booking fees, and security fees and taxes of $371. Yes, the fees and charges exceeded the airfare by $140. I went somewhere else. Oh, and I passed on the carbon offset as well. I figured I’d plant a tree instead for free.

Cheryl Emerson March 11, 2008 at 6:09 pm

So how do we get the money back?

mike gee March 12, 2008 at 5:27 pm

We get a credit on the the ship. I called and wrote to AG of Florida about the surcharge and talked to a lawyer. We was looking at a breech of contract if something was not done to remove the surcharge that was placed before Nov 16 th booking.

Sherrie Platt October 26, 2008 at 10:05 pm

I am confused – I booked and paid in full for a 30 day cruise on the Mariner of the Seas next Jan 4, 2009. My credit cards were charged for the full payment on June 11, 2008.

My invoice from the travel agent only lists “taxes” in addition to the basic cost of
my cabin. No WRITTEN mention of the fuel surcharges are listed on my invoice.
I was charged a total of $ 560 for the fuel surcharges (this was by verbal communication from my travel agent).

Do I have a refund due me
and who should I contact?? RCCL directly or my travel agent?? (My agent says
this refund of fuel surcharges is ONLY for cruises in 2010. However, RCCL’s
latest press release also mentions cruises for 2009).

Thank you.

Leave a Comment

Previous post: AirTran, where is my refund?

Next post: Elliott’s E-Mail/March 11, 2008