What's the book corporate America doesn't want you to read? Find out now -- or you could get scammed.

Even the attendants were baffled

July 28, 2006

What happened to Ted flight 1462 from Reno, Nev., to Denver on July 23rd?

Here’s what went down according to one passenger on the flight. Ted 1462 was supposed to leave at 5 p.m. but was delayed until 7:30 p.m. because of “weather,” according to a reservations agent.

Passengers boarded at 7:45 p.m. and the flight didn’t take off until after 8 p.m. — about four hours after its originally scheduled departure time.

The reason? Apparently Ted — United’s low-fare unit — couldn’t find a pilot.

“Ted simply forgot to give us a crew,” said Audrey Strong, who was on the flight with her husband, Richard.

Even the flight attendants were “baffled” by the crew mix-up. They told the Strongs, “You definitely deserve some sort of compensation because this is totally the airline’s fault.”

Do they?

First of all, I should say that I forwarded the Strong’s case to United yesterday to get its side of the story on 1462. When I get a response, I will add it to this blog posting.

Second, are the flight attendants correct? Check out United’s CSR file and in particular, its contract of carriage.

Scroll on down to United’s Rule 240, and you’ll see that United should have sent passengers on the next flight to Denver, even if it was on another airline.

The best that Ted 1462 passengers can hope for now that he flight is over is to write a polite letter to United and get a few goodwill vouchers.

United responds: After this item posted, United spokeswoman Robin Urbanski sent the following response: “The crew that was assigned to fly Ted flight 1462 did
not originate in Reno, which as you know is very common…assigned crew arrive on inbound flights that they have flown into a particular city.

“The crew’s schedule was to fly Phoenix to Denver (segment one) and then Denver to Reno (segment two) and then Reno to Denver (segment three). The crew got held up in Phoenix due to the weather in Phoenix, and did not make their Denver to Reno flight and that is why there was temporarily no crew available.

“We certainly did have pilots available on-call and those were the pilots that we deadheaded to Reno to fly the Ted flight 1462 you are asking about. Since Reno is not a base for United, we had to deadhead pilots into Reno whereas in our hubs we can call-in pilots who can get to work
in an hour.”

Christopher Elliott is the author of Scammed: How to Save Your Money and Find Better Service in a World of Schemes, Swindles, and Shady Deals. Critics have called it “eye-opening” and “inspiring” — it’ll “grab your attention and won’t let go.” Order your copy now on Amazon, Barnes & Noble or iTunes.

4 comments

  • Ari

    I call BS on this. If UA doesn’t have a crew, then their passengers should be entitled to compensation. I assume there were many passengers who missed connections in DEN and then had to spend the night. Those passengers should get hotel rooms and meal vouchers. I’d also think UA would provide some compensation.

    For anyone who needed to get somewhere the next day and missed their trip, they could probably invoke the “futile trip” clause in some DGR and get their money back. I pulled that with NW a couple years back, got my flight refunded and a $150 voucher.

    (They’d stranded me in DTW without pilots. They offered to fly me to my destination — TUL — via ATL, getting me in 8 hours late and in time to miss a wedding. It took a lot of calls, but I invoked the futile trip clause and got reimbursed.)

  • Mekhong Kurt

    @Ari, I’m not always comfortable with claims for compensation that exceed the actual extra expense(s) incurred by a passenger when an airline (or bus/rail/ship/taxi service, hotel, restaurant, etc.) screw up.

    In your own incident, I gather you had to miss the wedding, though you didn’t explicitly say so. If you did miss it, how much would be reasonable for . . . well, let’s call it the ever-popular “pain and suffering”?

    Before I go on, I do not now and have not ever worked for any airline or any other ttravel=related business. I have now and have had in the past friends who are and were. I also have never owned any stock in any airline, etc.

    While I don’t mean to imply that an airline that blows it should be allowed to just walk away leaving the passenger holding the bag (and not just figuratively holding it), I’ve long wondered when enough is enough. two experiences of mine reinforce my feeling.

    In mid-1986, I took a United flight to LA via Denver to connect with an onward flight to China via the now-defunct CAAC, China’s flag carrier, on one of CAAC’s then-three-times-per-week flights between China and the U.S. I *had* to make the connection, if at all possible.

    In Denver, an agent came around offering $59 vouchers to anyone who would volunteer for a flight delay, one long enough I would have missed my LA-Beijing flight. Given the demands of my schedule, I was never a candidagte for the offer, which escalated to $300 cash-on-the-spot (the agent approached me two or three times, desperate, due to a major overbooking problem on the Denver-LA flight).

    But quite a few people did accept. the put-off for me was that some, especially early on, told others to wait — to get more money. That’s hardly the spirit of volunteering. The fact that they were volunteering to accommodate the needs of a large airline, not some starving street person, shouldn’t matter, IMHO. either volunteer without expectation of reward (and if you get it, great) — or stay mum, if your main interest is to make yourself a opbject at an auction, in a sense, if an auction with only a single bidder (the airline rep).

    Another incident in mid-1990, also involving overbooking, confirmed my thoughts in Denver earlier. My wife dallied in the duty-free area in SF while I went to the gate to check us in for our flight to Beijing. The desk clerk was on the phone when I walked up, and I overheard him say he was desperate to get r more volunteers to take the JAL flight to Tokyo — through which my wife and I were scheduled to pass — set to leave in 5 minutes or so. Our flight (coincidentally, on United) had us laying over in SF about 2 hours and about the same at Narita. If we left then, it would mean a longer Narita layover, but a shorter SF one. So, when the guy hung up, I volunteered us, expecting nothing — there was no talk of compensation, vouchers, nothing like that. I rushed to get my wife then when we treturned, the guy handed me an envelope and said something like, “The check’s inside.” I was genuinely puzzled. When he told me it was $400 each compensation for our being “bumped,” I tried to return it — our tickets cost slightly less apiece than the $800, gor pete’s sake, and in any case, we hadn’t been BUMPED — I had volunteered.

    He and his supervisor, who was standing there, were quite insistent, so I finally took the money, though I later wrote United, both to thank them and to say I didn’t think they should have to pay me in such a case. (The guys in SF had said federal law required it.)

    Why should they have paid? The JAL flight had much better cabin service and food anyway (sorry, United!), we reconnected with the onward flight Narita-Beijing on United without a hitch, and landed in Beijing at our scheduled time all along.

    Further, we actually benefitted. Originally, we were to have about a 4-hour layover in Sf — but a short one in Narita requiring a mad dash from one gat to another. By accepting “the bump,” we got out of SF all the more quickly AND picked up extra time in Narita, giving us ample time to make the transit in a leisurely fashion.

    Ari, did we deserve the $400 apiece compensation? I think not.

  • Duke Nukem

    ‘Cuz Uni-ted breaks guitarssss!!!

  • Yvonne

    @Mekhong. I don’t understand your attitude about
    “volunteering.” Giving up one’s seat because airlines routinely
    overbook is not the same thing as “rendering a service” without
    compensation. When I am waiting for a trip I paid for and they need
    “volunteers” to be bumped, I agree to be bumped when the
    compensation meets the level that is worth the lost time. For
    example, $75 may not be enough to inconvenience the person who is
    set to pick me up or the plans I have on the other side. But $300
    may allow me to sufficiently accommodate my schedule. The idea of
    the poor airline as a “single bidder” at an auction is absurd -
    that airline took money from everyone sitting there in exchange for
    a seat on that aircraft. When that airline oversells, it certainly
    understands the risk it takes – that it will have to buy those
    seats back at a premium.

Previous post:

Next post: