What's the book corporate America doesn't want you to read? Find out now -- or you could get scammed.

Confessions of an infected airline passenger: “The most miserable six hours of my life”

October 30, 2009

surgicaWe’ve been hearing a lot lately about the dangers of flying with the flu, and the airlines’ refusal to loosen their rigid ticket change policies. But how does it looks from the passenger’s perspective?

Meet Amanda. She doesn’t want me to use her last name for reasons that will be obvious to you in a moment. She had the flu but decided to fly.


This is her story:

The night before my return flight, I began to feel sick, and by the morning of my flight I had the full blown flu, with coughing, fever, and chills.

I called Southwest to bump my flight by a day, and while the rep was kind, she couldn’t do anything but offer me the opportunity to pay the change in fare (about $300). Since this was not a possibility for me, I reluctantly dosed myself with cold medicine and endured the unending stares of everyone on the shuttle, in the security line and boarding around me on my flight and endured the most miserable six hours of my life flying.

Putting aside my own misery, I felt just horrible for everyone I came into contact with, given everyone’s concern for the flu this season. Granted, I doubt I have H1N1 and at least 30 percent of my flight was wearing a surgical mask, but I wish I could have done more.

Wait a second. Didn’t the Southwest flight attendants notice her illness and suggest she fly another day? (That’s what they’re supposed to do.) No, they didn’t.

I was very obviously sick throughout the flight, huddled in my seat shivering and sniffling, and upon exiting the flight, I specifically pulled aside a flight attendant to mention that perhaps they would like to spray down the tray, etc because I wouldn’t want anyone else to get sick.

They seemed unconcerned.

Did I skip a step I could have taken? Perhaps someone else could get the benefit, and to my fellow travelers, I apologize.

I think Amanda did everything she could, short of paying Southwest another $300. She might have notified the gate agent that she was sick. Southwest might have denied her boarding and allowed her to rebook her flight for the following week.

I asked Southwest to comment on her story. Here’s what it had to say:

As always, it is important to do as much as possible to ensure a healthy workplace for our employees and a clean travel experience for our customers. In light of the current issues around both seasonal and H1N1 flu, we are following the recommendations of the CDC and working with federal health organizations to attempt to minimize the impact.

First and foremost, however, all customers should practice common sense. As recommended by the CDC, customers who are too sick to travel should stay home – for both their own comfort and the health of others.

As has always been our policy, if a customer is unable to travel because of an illness and is holding a nonrefundable reservation, they are able to use the funds in the reservation within 12 months of original purchase date to apply toward future travel – without a service charge.

That said, in extreme cases, we’ve been known to make exceptions to our policy. I’m sorry if the agent Amanda spoke with did not suggest that she contact our customer relations department for that consideration, and that she ultimately made the decision to travel.

If an cmployee encounters a customer who has flu-like illness while at the airport or inflight, our employees should follow the CDC’s guidance by asking the individual to use good cough etiquette and hand hygiene. Further, we are maintaining a supply of key items to support good hygiene such as hand soap and disposable towels, cleaners or cleaning wipes, tissues, alcohol-based hand sanitizer, gloves, and, for certain situations, facemasks.

Judging by Amanda’s note, it sounds like facemasks may have been distributed to several customers onboard, unless, of course, those customers brought their own.

Customers who were on Amanda’s flight may take comfort in knowing that all of our aircraft are equipped with HEPA (High Efficiency Particulate Air) filters that effectively filter the 50-50 combination of outside and re-circulated air onboard each plane (hospitals use these same type HEPA filters to provide patients — and hospital personnel and visitors — with the cleanest air possible).

Nevertheless, we strongly suggest that customers who have the flu or flu-like symptoms honor the CDC’s recommendations and simply stay home.

Had Southwest followed its own policy and had Amanda followed CDC’s recommendations, she might have been able to avoid the most miserable six hours of her life. But surveys suggest most airline passengers would do exactly what she did.

That can’t end well.

(Photo: roujo/Flickr Creative Commons)

Christopher Elliott is the author of Scammed: How to Save Your Money and Find Better Service in a World of Schemes, Swindles, and Shady Deals. Critics have called it “eye-opening” and “inspiring” — it’ll “grab your attention and won’t let go.” Order your copy now on Amazon, Barnes & Noble or iTunes.

86 comments

  • http://cestbeth.com/ Elizabeth

    If the telephone agent had explained their cancellation policy to her, she could have canceled and rebooked with no penalty and no sick flying. Totally unacceptable.

  • Teresa Stewart

    Now hang on a second here. Southwest is one of the most liberal airlines out there when it comes to making changes, and had Amanda actually tried to change her ticket to fly one week later she likely would have gotten a much less expensive advance purchase fare on the new ticket. Instead she says she asked to move her flight by one DAY – which means full fare. It ALSO means she would still have been sick, I don’t know a soul who could be as sick as she says she was, and 24 hours be completely better. Chances are she’d be just as sick, if not worse.

    I’m sorry, but Southwest is NOT the bad guy here, and certainly didn’t do anything that justifies Amanda’s decision to fly and expose at least one planefull of people to what she had (which likely IS H1N1, since the CDC says that’s the only flu going around right now).

  • Richard

    @Elizabeth:

    “Totally unacceptable?” They did offer her to rebook with no “penalty”… except there WAS a penalty: an additional $300 charge for the fare difference!

    I’m sorry, that’s utter bullshit. While yes, I understand that there are people who will undoubtedly abuse it if the airlines loosened their policies, it’s better for THEM and US if they stopped treating us all like cattle with dollar-sign brands.

    If I’m sick? I’m sorry, I’m flying. Why? Because I can’t afford the difference in fares. Don’t like that? Complain to the airline. Their pricing system is the problem.

  • Toni

    Amanda’s decision to fly was selfish, self-serving and irresponsible. The flight attendants have a regulation in their manual telling them to deny boarding to anyone who “appears” or “seems” ill. They should have done so.

  • Ken

    I agree with another comment…”Southwest will let you re-book without charging a change fee…” They DO charge the difference in ticket cost. Since The President has declared an emergency, the airlines need to scrap their draconian measures and if someone calls and says they have the flu and can’t fly the airlines should allow a re-booking at the EXACT same cost as the original ticket. They will keep their other passengers safe from infection and their gesture will win over people to their airline. Seems to be a great P.R. move for the airlines to implement.

  • http://aol barbie45

    Amanda was quite apologetic; maybe she hoped it was a 24 hr bug; 300.00 bucks is quite a bit; maybe she had to be there sick or not; she took all the precautions; after all Obama has declared this an emergency. the airlines have to take some some of the blame. I have flown after coming home from trips with a cold ; what is a person suppose to do thats life.

  • Jeanne

    *I* don’t know why it was that Amanda had to fly at that particular time, although I can think of several reasons. As the headline read, it was the most miserable 6 hours of her life. No one endures that willingly. The information she had from Southwest – that she tried to obtain before the flight – was incorrect. She relied on incorrect information to make her decision. If she didn’t *have* the $300, that doesn’t make her “selfish, self-serving and irresponsible”; just short of money. I think she took all the appropriate steps to protect herself and others, given the circumstances.

  • Lisa S

    I think Southwest acted with its usual, good, customer service. As Richard noted above: It is the pricing system that is the problem. I think Amanda did what she had to do. I do not think she was selfish at all. Unless you are rich like the creeps at that one department at AIG and the upper management at all the finance firms, $300 is not an affordable amount of money to pay. I don’t know for what reason Amanda needed to fly. If it was simply a family visit, it probably would have been wiser to cancel the whole trip as family doesn’t want to get sick and the entire purchase price is applicable to another–later-fare on Southwest. If the trip was for something she couldn’t cancel, then Amanda did what she had to do and got to her destination, while trying to be as considerate as possible. While unfortunate, there aren’t any other options when living in a large country like the US. I mean, it’s not as if we have a decent rail system so that Amanda could have booked an affordable sleeping compartment on an overnight train.

  • Ames

    I agree that flying a week later would have been far more prudent, Amanda was just as sick and infectious one day later. With SouthWest’s open seating plan, I bet most of the open seats were near her so she might have even been rewarded with extra space for those miserable six hours.

    Unfortunately, if she had flown a day early before the symptoms were so obvious, she probably would have been just as infectious but no one would have known.

    I cannot imagine what would be important enough to justify this behavior, because she had to be still quite sick when she arrived.

  • Mike

    While flying when sick is irresponsible and self-serving, it’s also completely understandable, based on current policies. If someone who is too sick to fly has to pay the same penalty as someone who wants to change flights so they can be home in time to watch “Desperate Housewives”, then it shouldn’t be entirely surprising that people will fly.

    Keep in mind that insurance will allow you to cancel, and reimburse your losses, but it will NOT get you where you wanted to go. If I canceled a $250 flight from CLE to MIA because I was too sick to fly today, I could book for travel three days later, but that same flight would cost twice as much, and that difference would not be covered under insurance. Even with insurance, the traveler would have to pay the price difference between the fares.

    BTW, props on the Southwest praise sandwich. In summary: “SWA follows all government guidance. That passenger was an idiot for taking ‘no’ for an answer without going up the food chain. SWA’s cabin air filters are the shiznit.” That is quality PR, just a bit ham-handed. “The door for illness-related airfare relief is open, but only a little bit, and only when we feel like it.”

  • http://www.blogsouthwest.com Paula Berg – Southwest Airlines

    Chris – I have to say I’m a little surprised by your take on this one.

    First, you say that the Flight Attendants did not follow policy; however, I’m not clear on which policy you are referring to. Our Flight crews follow the CDC guidelines that I mentioned in my previous email to you. There is no policy that I am aware of that says that Flight Attendants should deny boarding to anyone who appears ill or even suggest that they fly another day.

    Our Flight Attendant’s are many things, but trained physicians they are not. Amanda acknowledges in her email to you that she was too sick to fly. Yet, you believe it is our Flight Attendant’s responsibility to make that determination. I appreciate that you are looking out for the Customer, but what about the other 136 Customers onboard? And what about personal responsibility and accountability?

    I fly nearly 50 percent of the year, so I’m very familiar with the pre-flight routine. In my observations, Flight Attendant’s are tiding up the cabin, greeting Customers, helping folks with their luggage, checking bags that weren’t able to fit in the bin space, explaining the emergency exit row procedures, assisting Unaccompanied Minors and Customers with disabilities, ensuring that seatbelts are fastened, items are stowed properly under the seat, and that all electronic devices are turned off.

    Now you would like to add to that list: visually inspect all Customers and make your best guess as to whether or not that Customer is in good enough health to fly?

    As a frequent traveler, I’m not sure how I feel about that proposition. Sometimes I cough in flight because my throat is dry, sometimes I sneeze after I eat a mint, sometimes I shiver because I’m cold – all of which could be interpreted to be flu-like symptoms. Asking Flight Attendants to begin denying boarding to any Customer who exhibits symptoms seems like a somewhat unreasonable request and a slippery slope.

    Paula Berg
    Southwest Airlines

  • Jean Farmer

    Amanda you should be ashamed of yourself as what if there was a person on that flight that had medical concerns already and the flu would have caused them to have to be hospitalized and they had passed away. Do you feel bad now. All you would have done was pay an additional $300.00 or stayed at home but these people lost their life. That is so selfish of anyone who would do that. Suppossed you saved for 15 years for that special vacation that was your only one to celebrate your anniversary or something else and you caused them to get sick and ruin their entire trip. That is what is wrong with this world. You rude inconsiderate person. Let’s start thinking of others more than we think of ourselves and we will live in a better place.

  • Michelle

    I’ve flown sick twice. Once, to my brother’s unexpected funeral. It was “only” a cold, and everyone around me probably thought the watery eyes and runny nose were because I couldn’t stop crying.

    The second time, I was in Italy on business and felt sick the day before departure. We stayed overnight near Venice, and I visited a local pharmacy for some medicine, slept the remainder of the day and night, and went to board the plane the next day. I informed the ticket agent and the gate agent that I had been sick, and asked if there were any provisions for sick passengers (I was told no), then asked if there was a place to sit without someone right next to me. They found me a seat with no one next to me, but there was a woman with a small baby in front of me. I informed the flight attendant again, but they seemed unconcerned.

    If wanting to go to my brother’s funeral or not being able to afford additional nights in Venice out of my own pocket was “selfish, self-serving and irresponsible,” then that’s what I am. I missed seeing my brother before he died, and I wasn’t missing his funeral, no matter what. And I’m sorry that I don’t have thousands of dollars to spare to allow me to change flights and stay in Italy after a business trip multiple days to get over a sinus infection before I flew home.

    As far as H1N1 being “the only flu out there,” I can’t find anything that says that on the CDC website, although I may be missing it. In the meantime, however, I know at least a dozen people in different areas of the country who have been diagnosed with the flu, been tested for H1N1, and it’s come back negative. So it can’t possibly be the “only one,” unless every single one of the laboratories processing all these tests in different states is flawed.

    Amanda doesn’t mention the reason for her trip, so we don’t really know. The fault lies with the airlines who are far more concerned about their bottom line than the health or well-being of their passengers. As always, they have the power, and if they wanted to, they could institute a policy that takes responsibility instead of blaming it on their customers.

  • Kris

    If she waited a few more days to fly, the fare would have likely been cheaper. Instead she wanted to go the next day, and in those 24 hours, she would likely still be sick. She could have also cancelled the trip altogether and tried to make it when she was feeling better. The only bullshit here is that Amanda was self-centered enough to expose the plane to what may have been the flu. God forbid it was something much worse or she had an in-flight medical emergency.

  • Christopher Elliott

    @Paula, I’m given the impression that flight attendants can remove a passenger if they appear too ill to fly, and that it is Southwest’s policy to deny someone boarding if they are too sick.

    I was very obviously sick throughout the flight, huddled in my seat shivering and sniffling, and upon exiting the flight, I specifically pulled aside a flight attendant to mention that perhaps they would like to spray down the tray, etc because I wouldn’t want anyone else to get sick.

    Your attendants may not be doctors, but I don’t see how they could have missed this. Maybe I’m missing something?

    For the record, I think your change policy is one of the most generous, if not the most generous, in the industry. Other airlines would have forced Amanda to pay a $150 change fee, plus a fare difference.

  • Topher

    @ Toni:
    Irresponsible? I really don’t think you can make that judgement, nor can any of us without knowing the reasons for Amanda’s flight. Not everyone can afford to just cancel their travel plans, especially if they have invested a lot of money that they won’t get back. Maybe she had to get somewhere for a job interview! Or for an important family function! Of course she was serving her own interests, but so are those who get all high and mighty by looking down on her. Getting sick is a fact of life – yes, it’s unpleasant, and yes, ideally, whenever people get sick they would be able to stay home and isolate themselves, but that’s simply not practical in the real world. I would totally do the same thing she did, except I probably would have worn a surgical mask myself, were I in her shoes, to reduce droplet exposure for those around me.

  • Passing through

    I’m with Amanda. There is no way I’m shelling out $300 extra for a flight that was probably already overpriced.

  • Anonymous

    I disagree that Southwest was at fault here. To me they were extremely reasonable. All they were asking for was the fare difference. God forbid that anybody be allowed to ask for the going rate for a product or service. Southwest wasn’t taking advantage of an emergency – they followed their normal fare structure. It’s not like the stores that after a hurricane warning is issued triple their prices, Southwest was just using their normal business practices.

    BUT to those of you saying she should’ve waited another week and could’ve gotten a cheaper fare, remember that per the story this was her RETURN flight. Staying another week probably would’ve meant 7 nights in a hotel – probably costing a lot more than $300. If she was that sick, she should’ve bit the bullet and paid the $300 to change her flight. Then filed the claim for the $300 against her travel insurance – if she had been smart enough to buy it.

  • Sarah

    Someone could “appear ill” and it’s just allergies or a sinus infection. Is it fair to deny boarding to someone who isn’t contagious and has never been contagious?

    When I get a cold, my cough hangs around for at least a couple weeks, making me “appear ill” when I feel perfectly fine. The bottom line is that you don’t know what anybody has or why they need to travel. Since I don’t have an extra 300 dollars lying around, I think most people would be stuck between a rock and a hard place in her situation.

  • hunemene

    Many comments have said that Amanda should have stayed home or traveled a week later. Please note that her story begins with “The night before my RETURN flight” [emphasis added]. To me, that puts things in a different light. One might not have as many options available to extend the stay away from home by more than a day or so.

  • Chris in NC

    @ Chris (Elliott)

    I know I am late on the discussion (first time logged in on the blog today), but Paula makes a valid point. Flight attendents are not trained health care professionals. As I commented on previous posts, the issue of contageous and infectious often is not related to physical appearance. If flight attendents do effectively become to determining factor for who is “too sick” to fly, I am afraid that you will a flood of people complaining that they were singled out to be denied boarding because they sneezed or coughed. I can see the scenario… flight attendent doesn’t like passenger A, denies boarding claiming that A is “sick”

    If Amanda really had the flu, she would be potentially contageous for at least several days. Delaying her flight by 1 day would not minimize the threat to other passengers. Likewise, there are numerous passengers who are contageous and do not show symptoms.

    Lets not forget, Southwest does have the most liberal and flexible change policies. Supposed she tried to do this on say United, American or Delta. Everyone wants to play the “blame the airlines” game. Why is this the airlines fault? Do you think the airlines are the only place that you will catch an illness? What about riding the subway, bus, daycare, schools, hospitals, the grocery store, etc. Take common sense precautions, and not every illness will kill you!

  • zither

    From my reading, Amanda wasn’t leaving for a trip. She writes, the night before my RETURN flight. That means she was not at home. So those who are writing that she should have not flown until the next week are not taking into account the costs that would be incurred with extending a trip for an entire week. If she can’t afford the $300 fare increase, she certainly can’t afford a week’s worth of hotel stay.

    It seems to me the airlines are using these change fees too much as a revenue stream. Why can’t you just go standby the next day for no extra cost – that wouldn’t put any money in the airline’s pocket, but it wouldn’t take away from them, either. If you actually miss your flight, the airlines seem to be more accommodating – they put you on another flight, standby, for free. Why can’t they do that for sick people with a doctor’s note as a matter of course?

  • zither

    Oops – while I was posting, two other posters said the same things as I did. Oh, well…

  • Mindy

    (ROCK) Financial concerns
    Amanda
    (HARD PLACE) unknown flu like illness

  • Trisha

    One detail I think some of you who have commented are missing is the very first thing Amanda said – she was on a RETURN flight. She was just trying to get back home. However, what it comes down to is having to pay an additional $300 to change a flight. Not everyone has an extra $300 to shell out to the airline to change a ticket. If you ask me, it’s the airlines who are selfish, self-serving and irresponsible if they’re not willing to change a sick persons flight without charging them. Maybe they could put a policy in place that requests passengers to provide a doctor’s note stating they are not able to fly in order to allow them to rebook at no extra fee?

  • David Z

    Of course she was serving her own interests, but so are those who get all high and mighty by looking down on her.

    That’s pretty much where it boils down to: whose interests to serve. Don’t we all serve our own first before anyone else’s?

    One may feel Southwest is overpriced, even though they’re better able to give such lower than what other airlines (especially the legacy ones) do. And Southwest can feel they’re giving a subjectively reasonable, or even those lower than what they can really afford, but I agree with some that they’re likely using their normal business fare models.

    It’s a choice whether to serve someone else’s choice first before our own, and to be ready to deal with the result of that choice.

  • Ms. J

    I agree with Anonymouse and hunemene: if someone becomes ill just before their RETURN flight, they may have little choice but to fly back sick. They may be unable to extend their hotel stay or be unable to afford to pay last minute rates. If they are traveling solo, there may be no one to help take care of them in a foreign country, and if they just have a severe cold or the flu, they may not be admitted to a local hospital for care, even if they have medical insurance. On the other hand, I think if someone becomes seriously ill BEFORE the start of their travel, they should stay home. If they had to pay in advance for an expensive holiday, then they should have also purchased travel insurance that would cover them for having to cancel the trip due to illness. Airlines should offer free changes or credit toward future travel to passengers who try to do the right thing and postpone their travel when sick – especially if they have non-refundable tickets that they may have bought months in advance.

  • Joe Farrell

    What an evil person. Spreading YOUR illness because YOU don’t want to spend more money. What a loser. Pure and simple. End of story. No excuse. No, don’t even go there.

  • LarryC

    If I were seated next to “Amanda”, call me selfish, but I would have had her removed from the plane – a warning to all “Amanda”-like-minded morons.

  • http://aol barbie45

    Joe; not all people have the finacial resources you have; she was retuning home remember; for all we know she could have received the flu from her prior flight; obviously she felt miserable; and tried many ways to change; I am sure she feels miserable enought; no need to make her feel worse.

  • Christopher Elliott

    Amanda came forward because she was genuinely concerned about what had happened and didn’t like her options. I think she believes — as I do — that there has to be a better way.

    I was hoping this could be an opportunity to talk about solutions instead of pointing fingers.

  • http://aol barbie45

    Chris ; very well said; she shared her story of which she is ashamed of; I am sure we are all guilty at one point or another of SOMETHING WE HAVE DONE; DO NOT MAKE HER FEEL WORSE.

  • Anna

    Solution: Travel insurance.

    A proper travel insurance covers the expenses if you’re struck by illness or injury on your trip, and consequently not in a condition to go home. I wouldn’t leave home without it.

  • http://ELLIOTT Kathleen W.

    Financial considerations happen to be the reason MOST of us choose a particular airline or flight. Thus her inability to ante up the $300 is understandable. I have felt that sick myself on one occasion and I chose to wear a mask myself and use scrupulous hygienic practices. This was 3-4 years ago so no danger of swine flu but to a certain group of people even a cold can have deadly consequences. If Amanda had worn a good quality mask and changed it as soon as became moist at all (disposing of it maybe in a ziplock bag) and used really good handwashing skills, using alcohol based sanitizers and touching surfaces only with a paper towel she could probably have avoided infecting anyone. I am an RN and I acknowledge that the general public is not trained in good aseptic technique and this is where the powers that be could step up with signs clearly displaying proper handwashing technique and how to protects oneself and others. Passengers should be able to expect to fly without worrying that there may be a deadly outcome. She might also have considered (in advance of course) travel insurance. Ultimate responsibility rests with the ill individual.

  • eileen

    I love me some Southwest Airlines, but I also get Amanda’s point.

    Sometimes, even the best refund policies are penny wise and pound foolish. In all likeliness, if she could have flown the next day, she could have spent the day she would have traveled in bed, slamming fluids, and getting some rest. Meaning, that while she may not have felt fantastic the next day, she probably would have been in much better shape, and a bit less of a threat to other passengers.

    Southwest’s policies are extremely generous. However, I think in this kind of situatin, if the reservation agent had simply rebooked her for late the next day, at the price she had already paid, everybody would have won. The traveler would have had another 24-36 hours to shake this bug, her fellow travelers would not have had to deal with a sick passenger, and Southwest would have gotten a great reccomendation from her to her friends for future travel. Instead, her only option to travel during the days she apparently needed to travel, was to either fly sick or shell out an additional $300. I don’t know about her, but I don’t have an extra $300 laying around right now.

    Southwest is great, but I do feel they could have done better here.

  • http://aol barbie45

    Anna; we do not know whether this was a vacation which required a hotel stayor just a vist to friends or family whwn I go to vist a friend I do not take out flight insurance ; If you fly often enough to visit friends or family;; it can be quite expensive; now on a cruise or tour sure it is a definite period.

  • Lianne

    @ Joe – $300.00 is not a paltry sum of money for a lot of people, its quite possible that its not that she didn’t WANT to spend the money…perhaps she COULDN’T spend the money.

    As far as the flight attendent’s discretion…I recently flew to China and back woth a non-infectious bacterial sinus infection. I made sure to have a doc check it out and clear me in case Chinese quarentine check point held me up on suspicions of N1H1. Did I have some “flu-like” symptoms? Yup. Was I a danger to anyone? Nope. The only person miserable was me. If a flight attendant tried to deny me boarding because I *looked* sick I would have been pissed. And where is line even with infectious disea

    The airline do have some culpability in passengers choosing to fly sick with their pricing structures. If a passenger is legitimately sick with an infectious disease then perhaps they should be allowed to fly standby on a later flight for a minimal charge, provided they can provide a doctor’s note. Charging a walk-up differential is a bit harsh when the passenger has no control, and considering we’re supposed to give airlines leeways for “Acts of God” and other situations out of their control is seems only fair they should do the same for their passengers.

  • Anna

    @Barbie – my travel insurance is a $60/year add-on to my regular insurance. The conditions are much better than those of single-flight-insurance deals.

  • Stella

    Amanda could easily be any one of many people who currently fly for leisure and/or business travel. In her case, she knew she was ill. In other cases, people will be contagious and coming down with something and not even know it. They are actually more dangerous to others because they may not practice good hygiene and they certainly don’t know to wear a mask for example.

    In the ideal world, she should have not flown. It’s fairly clear that she, like many others, did not have the $300 plus money for other expenses she would have occurred had she delayed the flight. Today, there are plenty of working people traveling who could not do that. (Yea, it’s one thing if you’re on a leisure trip and you’re staying with your friends or family. Quite another if, for example, you’re on a business trip and you KNOW you will NOT be compensated for your stay. I know companies who have NOT reimbursed staffers, when they were literally so sick they could not get up and get on a plane, for the costs of extending their trip. Talk about incentive to put yourself and others at risk.)

    Until companies such as travel vendors and employers make it possible for sick people to NOT fly, there will be ongoing issues of exposure.

    And there will always be thoughtless, inconsiderate people (not Amanda) who will fly and not give a darn about anyone else. This includes people who can afford to make a change in their plans.

    Bottom line: If you travel today, you WILL be exposed to people who are sick and who have something you may not want to catch for the obvious and not-so-obvious reasons. Knowing that, you have to seriously consider whether you want the risk of exposure–and what it means to your life. (And even if you take precautions, look around. There are a lot of inconsiderate people traveling who don’t wash their hands, don’t use hand sanitizer, don’t wear gloves or a mask when they should. And don’t practice good hygiene in general.)

    H1N1 is NOT just any old flu and many of us personally know people (in their 20s, 30s and 40s–otherwise healthy) who have DIED from it. Can you blame people for being seriously worried about exposure? Anywhere?

    But especially on a plane? The healthcare warnings caution against spending extended periods of time in enclosed/confined spaces with lots of people. (They were referring to events, etc.) Well, a plane is an even more confined space than a sporting arena or concert hall.

    And please DO NOT BUY INTO the airline nonsense about HEPA filters. People have contracted contagious diseases via exposure on planes. You can get sick in a hospital. Come on. Don’t try to comfort yourself with false information.

    Right now, many people, who have the choice, are not flying because they are fearful about exposure. Consider this: You’re living in fear of losing your job. Or you’re unemployed. But you have to travel. And you get sick. Really sick. You may or may not have health insurance. You may or may not have the resources to get the healthcare you need. On the road or at home. True, you could be exposed to something anywhere, but you really don’t feel comfortable about flying for many hours.

    In today’s world of global disease, everyone is responsible and everyone has to do better and think of the common good, as well as their own.

    Airlines: Need to make it easier for those who are sick and have a legitimate need to put off a flight to be able to do so.
    (One thought: Have a doctor on standby at major airports or have a local doctor on referral /on call at others and have the airlines direct passenger to them for pre-flight review. If doctor deems that you should not fly, no fee change, no other charges.)

    Also: Dispense hand sanitizer, masks, glove, wipes and other related paraphenalia before you enter any flight. Take extra care to spray flights with special disinfectants, etc.

    Put disinfectant sprays in restrooms. Be sure sufficient quantity of hand sanitizers are available. Up the cleaning of these. (There are also ways to design/redesign these rooms for greater hygiene.)

    Create special / separate sections of planes for those who are ill to stay in. (Yea, I know what this sounds like, but…)

    Allow passengers to change seats if they do not want to be next to someone who is ill.

    Hotels: Special discounts for those who have just checked out and need to stay. See suggestions for airlines, as they apply.

    Flyers: Do not fly if you think you may be coming down with ANY flu. (And if you don’t know difference between cold/flu and other illnesses, educate yourself and fast.)

    If you know you are ill with the flu, don’t fly until you’re no longer contagious.

    ALL FLYERS: Act as if you might not only be able to catch something, but that you might also be a “carrier” of something.

    1. Always wear the appropriate mask. And make sure you put it on properly.

    Use all other possible measures (wearing mask, hand sanitizers, etc.) .

    Wipe down plastic surfaces when you are first seated. Wipe down door handles you may use, and any porous surface you touch, both before and after use, with antibacterial wipes. (And you know what? Hand me a can of Lysol spray when I board. I’ll spray down my seat and area if you’re too busy!)

    Yes, you should travel with these, but again, they should be made available to you by the airlines.

    Follow hygiene protocols re coughing, sneezing, etc.

    Most people are focused on their own health, which is as it should be. However, they also need to focus on the health of others.

    Some people right now are at risk of actual death should they get the flu. Some are at risk of being seriously ill. Today, being ill is a major issue due to so many people not having jobs, not having an income and not having healthcare/health insurance. One bout of the flu of any kind could literally change your life circumstances. Many working people are living on the edge.

    Right now, you have people exposed, on the ground, to tons of people who are sick and working and spreading infection/disease because they literally cannot afford to take a day off. (They will lose pay and may lose job.) It’s a major issue that cities are addressing right now.

    No one can afford to be cavalier about their health or anyone else’s. And EVERYONE must do their share.

    When people get sick, they need to be able to stay home and not lose jobs. They need to be able to get affordable healthcare. and easy access to treatment.

    Until we deal with all of this. flying is only one part of a much larger problem.

    And employers: It IS your problem and your responsibility to help people stay healthy and get help when they are sick.

    This is everyone’s problem, whether you fly or not. There’s no need to panic, but there is reason to be legitimately concerned.

    Travel vendors should not have to police people but if some do not practice common sense or show concern for others, the airlines may have to step up and prevent some from flying (again, with medical professionals making the calls, not flight attendants).

  • Kerry

    Someone’s not reading carefully enough here –

    Amanda was flying HOME from a trip. I can’t imagine a situation where booking the flight home A WEEK LATER would be reasonable — I’m sure hotel and food would cost well more than the $300 change in fare, which she couldn’t afford in the first place.

    Yes, if she was flying TO somewhere, the decision to stay home and rebook at another time would make sense. Flying HOME from somewhere else doesn’t give one much of a choice — sick or not, at some point in the not-too-distant future, a person needs to get back home.

  • Kerry

    Additionally, “appearing ill” to a flight attendant truly cannot be a reason to toss a person off a flight.

    I’ve had chronic asthma for more than 15 years, and I frequently sound as though I’m coughing up a large hunk of lung when my asthma is flaring up. Asthma is a danger to me, not anyone else. If anyone attempts to protect themselves from my inflamed brochial tubes, good luck and godspeed LOL.

    That said, I do practice good cough and sneeze etiquette and have for many, many years. I’m still disgusted daily by people who simple sneeze into the air or their hands, then go on as if nothing untoward has occurred. I hate to sound like a schoolmarm to my fellow passengers, but I will speak with fellow airplane passengers if I notice their mucous exiting their body into anything other than their shoulder or elbow. Even tissues are disgusting and a wonderful transmission method for colds and flu.

  • Gregg

    Amanda was unreasonable. Although she looks at it that it may have cost her $300 but it may have cost others thousands for her actions. If she got just two or three people sick on that flight, they could have been out from work for several days or more and not gotten paid for being out sick (not all jobs pay sick time) and if those people gave it to anyone, it all multiplied from one carrier (Amanda). Her thoughtless may have saved her $300 but likely shifted the costs and multipled it many times on others.

  • http://www.bonjourparis.com Karen Fawcett

    Chris – At what point will passengers have recourse against the airlines for allowing someone who’s THAT sick to fly? If I’d been Amanda, (providing I could have made it to the airport), I would have announced loudly for all to hear that I had flu and the airline wouldn’t allow me to postpone the trip without paying mega-bucks. I suspect her complaints would have been heard by the gate personnel.

    I’m currently doing battle with an airline insurance company because I bought a ticket to visit someone who was ill but was not considered terminally so. In the interim between my booking the flight (buying the insurance) and the departure date three week later, he died. The insurance company refuses to rebate the cost of the ticket because he had a pre-existing condition.

    Are we all going to be at the mercy of the airlines and the insurance companies?

  • David Z

    Long post, Stella. But pretty much agree with it as everyone’s practically affected.

  • Allison

    Three years ago I flew home from South Africa–JoBurg to London on British Air and London to Chicago on American. I was extremely sick. British Air told me that I would have to wait almost a week to take the next available flight out of JoBurg and pay over $1,000 in fees and fare differential just on that leg of the trip. Guess what. I took my original flight. Got to London, went to the American counter, nearly passed out. I boarded, sick as can be. No one really seemed to care. Not one airport or airline employee offered me any kind of assistance or asked me about my condition. Luckily I had two empty seats next to me on the second flight. Spent almost a month once home to recover from my unidentifiable African illness. What was I supposed to do? Spend an extra MONTH in Africa? I don’t think so. Selfish? No, just practical. Do the same thing again? Absolutely, without a doubt 100%. Sick people on planes is part of the deal. Until someone invents a machine that would magically transport me from South Africa to Chicago in a hermetically sealed compartment, I am left with no reasonable alternative. Don’t want to be around sick people? Move to the middle of nowhere and don’t leave your house.

  • Gary

    Wow, Amanda really does have a hairy chest.

  • Lynn

    This is a tough one – one in which it is easy to find both the traveler and the airline at fault (to some degree). I empathize with Amanda for not having the additional $$ but I do think if she was “that sick” she wouldn’t have been much better in 24 hours. Flights may or may not have been less than $300 a week later but who says she could wait a week, ill or not?

    I love Southwest — fly them almost exclusively BECAUSE of their liberal cancellation policies. The attendants are as good if not better than on other airlines and while they may or may not have been in a position to evaluate Amanda, then what? I can picture them needing to help make accommodations for her to stay where she was (hotel, etc.) once denied boarding — afterall she IS sick. Where does their responsibility end? Multiply this by potentially 100′s of passengerts a day. Geez…I just don’t know.

    This lbusiness puts us all in a less than good place.

  • Alan Gore

    This was selfish and inconsiderate, all right, but not on the part of Amanda. It’s the fault of the stupid airline fees and rules. Let a few planeloads of people get really sick when the ticket change rules require sick passengers to fly, and then perhaps we’ll see a real passenger rights bill get passed.

  • http://aol barbie45

    Stella you took a great deal of time in your letter good advice practical no; airlines are in the business to make a profit for their shareholders period. Having a doctor on standbye not cost effective; segregating sick passengers again cases for potential lawsuits; you just have to take the risks as you would just leaving your house; My girlfriend came back from China sitting inbusiness class ; she was exposed to 2 Chinese pasengers who were not following the most basic standards such as spitting which is commonin China.

  • Michael

    I have seen this from all 3 sides and to be fair I still think Amanda chose poorly.
    Over 10 years ago I came down with the flu while spending Christmas with family and when I went to fly home clearly shouldn’t have. Truth is I was foolish, it just never occurred to me to wait a few days to return. Luckily for all concerned when I vomited into a garbaage bin while in the boarding que a very wise USAir (yes they were still USAir back then) denied me boarding. Since this was leisure travel and I didn’t anticipate getting sick I had a discounted ticket which meant a change fee (only $50 back then) and a $75 fare difference due to full planes on a holiday week. In the end they made the right decision, I only got sicker that day and night and 3 days later felt much better and I’m fairly sure wasn’t contaguious anymore. Or at least I wasn’t sharing my bodily fluids as freely if I was.
    Flash forward a 15 years or so and I have suffered from rather severe allergies or years now. I frequently get into a public area and encounter an allergen that sets me off, but in my case the allergies get me phlegmed up so I end up coughing. I get stares and rude comments from the uninformed that assume I have a contagious condition. Just this week I had to take a business trip where the person sitting either in front or behind me brought something that set me off. It’s not their fault I have allergies and so there’s no point in saying anything to anyone, it’s my problem not theirs. On the other hand would I have been happy had some over zealous (and in this case uninformed) flight attendaant decided I should be denied travel becasue they felt I was contagious? Hell no, I would have been most unpleasant and most likely quite rude in my response to such a thing.
    Where am I going with this? Simple if you know you are infectious you stay off the plane, period. If it means a few extra dollars of expense so be it, no one said travel is cheap. I understand thuis was Amanda’s return flight, but really is $300 that much? Even if we acknowledge it would have been more like $600 with added lodging expense, is it still? Sorry, not against the average expense already laid out for a trip. My last 3 trips taken are a fair illustration, 2 for leisure and 1 for business. Just this week a 2 day business trip to the midwest, $1300 for airfare and $125 for hotel, total $1425. The change in fare would’ve been picked up by my company, but to be fair I’m not certain one way or the other on the additional nights hotel. I would’ve switched though to a mid range Hampton Inn or something similiar so an additional 3 or 4 nights would’ve set me back $250 or so, on top of $1425 not a great expense at all. About a month ago a long weekend in London, airfare $2500 (got a cheap biz class deal), hotel $350 with currency rate (really, really cheap internet special), and like all Americans spent way too much on overpriced clothing that I really didn’t need but wnated anyway, total (minus my several trips through Harrods and Next) $2850. Again if I had been too sick to return on Sunday night probably would been a $300 penalty due to the cheap ticket and 3 or 4 extra nights in the hotel in London would’ve been another $350 or so for a total of $650 extra to not suffer and not infect others. Lastly an end of summer trip to the Minnesota State Fair, airfare $600, hotel $240, total $840. A change would’ve cost me the $100 change fee and maybe 3 or 4 days hotel for a total of $280.
    In all 3 cases staying an extra 3 days would added 20%-25% to the total cost of the original trip. Is 20-25 percent really that big of a deal? I’m sorry I don’t think it is. Like I said I have seen this from all 3 sides, the cost, being denied, and being the allergic one who doesn’t need a crew member making judgements they are not qualified to make.

Previous post:

Next post: