|
What's
elliott?
About elliott
Contact us
t o p i c s
Business
Commentary
Destinations
Help
Leisure
Technology
Vault
Read
back issues. Like what you
see? Now you can become an underwriter.
a l s o
Referring sites
Public relations
Visit Tripso
Home
s e a r c h
Find a story.
Copyright Elliott Publishing. All rights reserved. For more information,
call (305) 453-4781 or send e-mail
to us.
|
|
Saturday
Night Stayovers Make No Sense
Ask Chris · April 6, 2000
Q:
Why are airline tickets cheaper when you don't fly on a Saturday
night? Once I had to fly home on a late Saturday afternoon, and I couldn't
believe my eyes when I reached the airport. It was like a ghost town!
Skeleton crews at desks, security, and luggage claims. Some shops and
restaurants closed. Empty seats on planes. I stretched out across my entire
row of seats and slept all the way home.
This makes no sense. In economics class we were taught that, to
get more business, a company would offer discounts and other incentives
to make people give them business during their slow periods.
So why do airlines want you not to fly them on Saturday nights?
Why don't they want seven-day-a-week business instead of only six?
-- Carol Anne Gordon
A:
Airlines use Saturdays to divide customers. Passengers who are able to
book an itinerary staying over a Saturday night are considered leisure
travelers and offered a reasonable airfare. Those who don't are generally
considered business travelers. Their fares aren't reasonable.
For example, a roundtrip ticket without a Saturday-night stay from New
York to San Francisco will set you back by a whopping $2121 on most of
the major carriers. With a weekend stay, it's only $389.
The Saturday night requirement is arbitrary and stupid. It assumes that
all vacations are long and that all business travelers are loaded. That's
unbelievable, considering the fact that the airlines employ honest-to-goodness
PhD's with rocket science degrees to handle pricing software (also called
"yield management" in airline-lingo). Can't these pinheads figure out
a better way to set prices?
I spoke with a few airline insiders, and they privately expressed their
frustration with the status quo. Basing the cost of a ticket on a single
day of the week is as foolish as it sounds, but the question is, what
do you replace it with? While carriers like American
Airlines and, most recently, Northwest,
have experimented with other ways of charging passengers (Northwest calls
them "flex" fares) inevitably, airlines return to the old Saturday night
rule.
Jim Haynes of the Commercial Travelers
Association has for years been a lone voice in the wilderness on this
issue. He's campaigned to lift the onerous Saturday-night requirements,
which he says penalizes frequent travelers - and especially small-business
owners and other entrepreneurs, who have to pay for airfares themselves.
But the airlines didn't budge.
All of which brings me to the answer to your question. Just because you
saw an empty airport doesn't mean you can assume the airline was losing
its shirt on that day. The passengers who were flying paid between eight
and ten times as much as the "leisure" travelers that flew the rest of
the week. And statistically speaking, many airports remain busy on Saturdays
now, say the airline execs I chatted with about this column. So your observations
probably represent the exception rather than the rule.
The issue you raise, however, is completely valid. Is it fair to charge
passengers more because of the nature of their trip? What's a more egalitarian
way of setting rates? I'd like your feedback on that. E-mail
with your thoughts and I'll include them in a follow-up column.
Christopher
Elliott is a travel commentator and author of A
Bridge to Nowhere: A Year in the Florida Keys. All e-mailed questions
may be edited, condensed or republished at the site's discretion.
Ask Chris appears weekly on this site.
|
|
|